For some more grounded stories and ideas, please feel free to explore Rosie's Words Words Words.

The Galaxy That George Built (and why it belongs to us now)

TL DR: Star Wars has always been presented as a work-in-progress with all of the creative decisions (included rejected ideas) available to the audience.  That is why we, as fans, are so quick and passionate on our own ideas of how it could have been improved.  And that’s to be expected.  And that’s okay.

Han Shot First!
The Old Trilogy Was Boring!
Jar Jar Must Die!
Mark Hamill Was A Whiney Baby!
Hayden Christensen Was A Whiney Baby!

Lucas shouldn’t killed off Boba Fett!
Lucas shouldn’t have focused on Darth Vader as a 10 year old kid!
Lucas shouldn’t have created the Ewoks!
Lucas shouldn’t have killed off Maul!

The Old Trilogy is the only “true” Star Wars!
The Prequel Trilogy is the best!

It was Lucas’s story…you don’t have the right to comment!
If you think you could do better…then make your own movies!


Why do we, as fans, engage is this destructive conflict?  Why do we resist order in the galaxy?

Because it’s freakin’ Star Wars…that’s why!!

I have ranted on more than one occasion as to why we cling to the original versions of the film, and to what the benefits are for the director’s cuts.  But I’d like to explore a different aspect of the collaborative nature of Star Wars.

From the very beginning, Star Wars had a communal and very open-source feel to it.  In 1977, Star Wars launched us into a fully-formed lived in universe.  The settings, the institutions, the characters were all living in an established society.  Perhaps more actualized than had even been before in media.

Basically, there are several types of fiction available:
Setting
Characters
Real
Real
Real
Invented (but realistic)
Real
Invented (but fantastical)
Invented (but realistic)
Real
Invented (but realistic)
Invented (but realistic)
Invented (but realistic)
Invented (but fantastical)
Invented (but fantastical)
Real
Invented (but fantastical)
Invented (but realistic)
Invented (but fantastical)
Invented (but fantastical)

So, why is it worth mentioning this?  Well, when you are working with any of the “Real” or “Invented (but realistic)” settings and characters, the audience already has a starting off point to tie into the narrative.  A good fantastical setting or character will eventually tie back into the real world in one of two ways...as a direct speculative examination of current or past events, or as a metaphor to describe past, current or speculative imaginings of future events.

The bottom line is that it all ties back to reality in one way or another.   Otherwise, it is so foreign that it becomes incomprehensible, or so distant as to have no meaning for or impact on the audience.  So, in 1977, George Lucas introduced the world to a Galaxy partially of his invention.  The Galaxy That Lucas Built was instantly recognizable because it would built from the essence of thousands of stories that came before it.  

It was the way that Lucas crafted and combined it that made it so magical.  But that crafting was the result of specific decisions during the extremely collaborative process that it took to make the film.  All film is collaboration, so Star Wars was no exception.

As soon as the completely fabricated world flickered on the blank canvasses of movie houses around the world, immediate interest in “How did they DO that?” arose.   And the audience was not left wanting.  The initial novel and comic book adaptations gave glimpses in the not-quite finality of a script that got changed due to narrative, budgetary and logistical concerns.  Editorial decisions like removing early scenes with Biggs Darklighter and an encounter with Jabba the Hutt from the movie were known to the public.

And for even earlier visions of from where The Star Wars would originate, concept sketches from the great Ralph McQuarrie gave us glimpses of an older statesmen-like Luke Skywalker dazzled the imagination.   A heroic Annakin Starkiller. Talking droids.

Vast sketchbooks of concept art were devoured by fans who enjoyed making-of-documentaries showing blue-screen models and vast matte paintings that held to give substance to a galaxy far, far away.

But with this behind the scenes fascination, comes the inevitable fallibility of the entire process.  Once a decision is made, the rejected option remains in the mind…in the imagination.  It is imagination that gives gravitas and import to the backstory of this newly discovered lived-in universe in the first place.  We cared about this foreign world, because we could imagine each character and building and ship having a vast history both before and after their moments on screen. 

And that same imagination applied itself to the images on the screen, itself.  Things as simple as Chewbacca being brown and hairy rather than green and scaly were up for a debate.  How would the movie have played differently with a different aesthetic?   How would the movie have played differently if Obi-wan had lived to be at Leia’s side in the command center?

What I’m getting at is that the audience has always been involved with (or at least aware of) the iterative and collaborative process.  So, why wouldn’t we have an opinion on what choices were or weren’t made?   The fabricated fantastical settings and characters were presented as the deliberate selection of specific decisions made by hundreds of skilled and talented craftsmen…be it the narrative, the visual effects, the sound choices, the musical score. 

All of it was the result of choices.  And the choices not selected are no less interesting than the choices that were.  When we rage against changes the like Greedo shooting first or Vader shown murdering children, not hunting down and destroying Jedi Knights we do so, because we know that this fiction comes from the decisions of the artists.   It is not a non-fiction documentary were an outcome is presented as the fact that it is based upon.  It is a made-up story about a made-up world. 

And that’s okay.  But to say that we, as the audience, does not have the right to comment on the decisions made by the artists, is just silly.  No other art form receives a free-pass for criticism.  Painting, literature, music, photography, film…all are sparks for discussion and for expanding the mind.  What else does art provide? 


So, when Star Wars fans have an opinion, be it good or bad…of course, they have the right.  And to expect anything otherwise, is just silly.  In my humble opinion.

No comments: